- Products
- Game Content, Live Casino, PAM
- Licences
- UKGC, MGA, ONJN
The catalogue
Compare B2B iGaming software providers
Filter by what you actually need. Every card shows where its facts came from and when they were last checked.
Showing 36 of 36 providers
Aggregator
- Products
- Casino Platform, Game Content, Live Casino, Game Aggregation
- Licences
- Curaçao
- Products
- Sportsbook
- Licences
- Not disclosed
Turnkey
- Products
- Casino Platform, Sportsbook, Game Content, Game Aggregation, Affiliate Software, Payments
- Licences
- MGA
AggregatorModular / API
- Products
- Casino Platform, PAM, Game Aggregation, Payments
- Licences
- Not disclosed
TurnkeyModular / API
- Products
- Casino Platform, Sportsbook, Game Content, Live Casino, PAM, CRM & Bonusing, Game Aggregation, Affiliate Software, Payments
- Licences
- SEGOB, AGCO, ONJN, HGC +3
White LabelTurnkeyModular / APIAggregator
- Products
- Casino Platform, Sportsbook, Game Content, Live Casino, Game Aggregation, Payments
- Licences
- MGA, VID Latvia, BGC, IoM GSC +2
- Products
- Sportsbook, Live Casino, Risk & Trading, Odds & Data Feeds
- Licences
- MGA, Curaçao, Peru
TurnkeyModular / APIAggregator
- Products
- Sportsbook, Game Content, Live Casino, CRM & Bonusing, Game Aggregation, Affiliate Software, Payments
- Licences
- Not disclosed
White LabelModular / APIAggregator
- Products
- Casino Platform, Sportsbook, PAM, CRM & Bonusing, Payments
- Licences
- Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, Gambling Commission of Great Britain, Michigan Gaming Control Board, Indiana Gaming Commission +24
Navigate
Browse by solution type
- White Label iGaming Platforms You launch a branded site on the provider's licence and infrastructure. Fastest route to market, least control. 10 providers
- Sportsbook Software Providers Betting engines, odds feeds and the trading and risk tools behind them, for operators adding a sportsbook. 25 providers
- Casino Affiliate Software Partner tracking, commission models and affiliate payouts for operators running their own affiliate programme. 12 providers
- iGaming Platform Providers The core technology an operator runs on: player account management, wallet, back office and game integration. 21 providers
- Turnkey iGaming Solutions Providers The full stack from one vendor — platform, games, payments and hosting — while you hold the gambling licence. 18 providers
- iGaming Game Studios & Providers Studios and aggregators supplying slots, live dealer tables and other content through a single integration. 20 providers
- iGaming Back-Office & CRM Software Player management behind the scenes: segmentation, bonusing, retention campaigns and day-to-day operations. 9 providers
Delivery models
Turnkey, white label or platform licence: what actually differs
Vendors do not use these terms consistently. Compare the variables, not the labels — the clearest dividing line is who holds the gambling licence.
| Model | Licence held by | Player data | Time to launch | Cost shape | Customisation | Exit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White label | Provider | Provider controls | Fastest | Low upfront + revenue share | Limited | Hardest |
| Turnkey | Operator | Operator | Medium | Higher upfront + revenue share | High | Moderate |
| Platform licence | Operator | Operator | Slowest | Highest upfront, no revenue share | Full | Easiest |
| Aggregator | Operator, already licensed | Operator | Fast | Margin on content | Lobby only | Depends on integration |
| Hybrid / modular | Operator | Operator | Varies | Mixed | High | Per module |
Green favours the operator · amber is a trade-off · red is a constraint you take on.
Before you sign: three clauses that decide your exit
- Player data export
Can you take the raw database with you? Lock-in is discovered at exit, not at signing.
- Revenue share base
NGR and GGR are not the same number. Check which one the percentage applies to.
- Termination rights
What notice period, and what happens to player balances and open bonuses.
Compliance
Who is responsible for compliance
Compliance sits with the licence holder. It cannot be delegated to a partner.
On white label deals this matters most: the provider holds the licence, so the provider carries the regulatory duty — and the regulator holds them to it. The UK Gambling Commission has found licensees passing customer-interaction and anti-money-laundering duties to white label partners without oversight, and treats white label agreements as reportable key events.
Licensing structures also change. Curaçao has replaced its old master and sub-licence model — operators there now hold licences in their own name, and B2B suppliers are licensed separately. Older «licence included» marketing predates this.
Selection criteria
Best solutions for iGaming: 8 criteria that actually matter
The best B2B iGaming solutions are not the ones with the loudest marketing. They are the ones that answer hard questions in public, before you ask.
- A stated delivery model
Good suppliers say plainly whether you launch on their licence or your own. Vague answers here mean a vague contract later.
- Published certifications
GLI-19 and GLI-33, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, RNG testing by eCOGRA or BMM. Serious vendors list them with certificate references. Weak ones say «fully certified».
- Named markets, not «global coverage»
Ask which regulated jurisdictions they are live in today. A supplier already live in your market has passed your regulator's technical standards.
- Documented integration
Public API documentation, a stated integration method and a sandbox. If the docs sit behind a sales call, integration will too.
- Named clients
«Trusted by industry leaders» is not a reference. Named operators with a public launch announcement are.
- Data ownership in writing
Who owns the player database, and can you export it in full. Almost nobody publishes this. The best suppliers will put it in the contract without a fight.
- Support with numbers attached
24/7 means nothing without a response time. Look for a named service level, an escalation path and a dedicated account manager.
- Compliance tooling built in
Anti-money-laundering and KYC checks, responsible-gambling limits, self-exclusion and reality checks — native, not bolted on afterwards.
Methodology
How this directory is built
Two layers, kept apart: the facts about a supplier, and what we make of them. You can disagree with our reading without doubting the data underneath it.
Facts, from named sources
Each fact on a card comes from a public page — usually the supplier's own site — and is stored with a verbatim quote and the date it was checked. Licence numbers are matched against regulator registers wherever a public verification page exists.
Gaps marked, not filled
What we could not verify is shown as not disclosed. We do not estimate, and a supplier's own claim is recorded as a claim, not as confirmation.
Our assessment, kept separate
Where we add an editorial view of a supplier, it sits beside the sourced facts rather than inside them, and we state the reasoning behind it. Neither listing nor assessment can be paid for.
iGaming software: common questions
What is iGaming software?
iGaming software is the technology online casinos, sportsbooks and other gambling operators run on: player account management (PAM), casino games, sportsbook engines, payments, bonusing and compliance tools. Operators either license a complete platform or combine modules from several suppliers.
What types of iGaming software providers are there?
Platform providers supply the PAM and back office; game studios and live casino suppliers supply content; aggregators deliver many studios through one integration; sportsbook suppliers run betting; turnkey and white label vendors package these parts into a ready-to-launch product.
Platform, turnkey or white label — what is the difference?
A platform licence gives you the core technology and you run everything else, including your own gambling licence. Turnkey packages the platform with games, payments and hosting, and you still hold the licence. White label puts you on the provider's licence and infrastructure: fastest to launch, least control. Compare the models side by side above.
What is PAM software?
Player Account Management is the system of record for an operator: identity, wallet, transactions, KYC status, bonuses and responsible-gambling limits. Every real-money operation runs on one, whether built in-house or licensed from a platform provider.
How do I choose an iGaming software provider?
Start with the delivery model, because it decides who holds the licence and who owns the player data. Then filter by product category and by the markets you are licensed in. Ask every shortlisted supplier for the same written answers: integration time, data export rights, revenue share base and termination terms.
How much does iGaming software cost?
Most suppliers do not publish prices. Common models are revenue share, a setup fee plus a monthly licence fee, or fixed fees per module. Where a provider states its pricing model publicly, it is shown on its card; otherwise the card says to contact the supplier.
How long does integration take?
Suppliers commonly quote days for a single game API and weeks to months for a full platform. Timelines depend on your licence, payment rails and certification requirements. Ask for a reference client under the same regulator rather than a generic estimate.
Can I test a platform before signing?
Many suppliers offer a demo environment or a sandbox API, but few publish it. Where a provider states demo or trial access publicly, it is shown on its card.
Who owns the player data?
It depends on the model and on the contract. Under a white label the provider usually controls the player database. Under turnkey and platform licences the operator normally owns it. Almost no supplier publishes its terms, so get export rights in writing before signing.
How are providers checked in this directory?
Every fact on a provider card comes from a named source, usually the provider's official website, and is stored with a verbatim quote and the date it was checked. Licence numbers are matched against regulator registers where a public verification page exists. Anything without a source is shown as not disclosed.